9. maj 2012, 20:18
#165377
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasoni ... 091797.htm
så hvis det er billedekvalitet, havde jeg helt sikkert valgt en st50 eller gt50
During the time the TX-P50GT50 has been with us, we incidentally calibrated some other LED LCD televisions and ran them side by side with the GT50. After a Panasonic Plasma binge, we’re glad that we did, because it’s a sobering reminder of the competition. Many LED LCDs certainly provide good picture quality, and we have no bias towards one display technology or the other – if an LED LCD was to come along that had the same uniformity, freedom from viewing angle restrictions, and black depth, we’d be all over it – but no such (consumer?) LED LCD display exists.
den konklusion kommer Rasmus 99.9 procent også med
lkodk skrev:Det er netop min bekymring på 55".se denne test af gt50 og deres test ligger som altid på linie med Rasmus
I anmeldelsen får jeg det indtryk, at der ikke er noget nævneværdigt på 46", hvilket lover rigtigt godt.
Jeg overvejer kraftigt at investere i 55" , men hvordan står det til med backlight bleed på den størrelse?
Hvad siger I der allerede har købt ES8005 i 55"?
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/panasoni ... 091797.htm
så hvis det er billedekvalitet, havde jeg helt sikkert valgt en st50 eller gt50
During the time the TX-P50GT50 has been with us, we incidentally calibrated some other LED LCD televisions and ran them side by side with the GT50. After a Panasonic Plasma binge, we’re glad that we did, because it’s a sobering reminder of the competition. Many LED LCDs certainly provide good picture quality, and we have no bias towards one display technology or the other – if an LED LCD was to come along that had the same uniformity, freedom from viewing angle restrictions, and black depth, we’d be all over it – but no such (consumer?) LED LCD display exists.
den konklusion kommer Rasmus 99.9 procent også med