Vil trådstarter ikke være sød og forklare hvad det egentlig er du mener med uægte 4K og hvad er det som du refere som "uægte"?
Jo herligt at du siger det har hjulpet en masse' men hvad er det som du er blevet klogere af, omkring uægte 4K
For hvis det er selve RGB structure med udgangspnkt i RGB vs RGBW som du opfatter som uægte 4K..
Du er jo næppe den eneste, som tilsyneladende er i tvivl om brugen af en rum mængde hvide pixels i RGB structure blandt visse serier, især hos LG, Ikke mindst kva ovennævnte link til 4k.com artikel i ref til 2016 modeller....
for en del tyder på at det netop er sådanne artikler her' som nok ligger til grund for din grad af "uægte 4K LG TVs"
----
In the case of select LG TV models, even the basic 4K spec itself, which should be a guaranteed minimum of any TV which is called a 4K set, may not completely apply. Specifically, this is the case with LG’s low-priced.
These particular TVs don’t even deliver truly competition-comparable 4K ultra HD resolution but, LG itself still calls them 4K televisions.
And this is where the rub lies. The UH6100, UH6400 and UF6800 models all offer lower prices by LG standards but LG’s description of them as real 4K TVs is disingenuous in a way we haven’t seen with the most affordable ultra HD TVs from any other brand on the market. Unlike Samsung’s Sony’s, Vizio’s or other brands’ most basic UHD televisions, these LG models don’t even deliver on their 4K resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels in the classical sense of the spec. Instead, what they do offer is a sort of pseudo-4K which really consists of 2.8K native full color resolution.
The UH6100, UH6400 and UF6800 series TVs do indeed offer 2160 horizontal scan lines with 3840 pixels in each line but unlike regular real UHD displays, these models pull a sort of trick which reduces image sharpness by substituting red, green and blue subpixels in some of their full pixels for white subpixels. This mechanism is called RGBW and it’s distinctly inferior to the RGB found in real 4K TVs.
All of these points have their validity but the fact remains that these TVs are being marketed as 4K models and in reality they don’t actually produce 4K levels of picture sharpness. Those red, green and blue pixels are crucial to sharp details of content on the TV and the replacement of a full quarter of them with generic white pixels creates exactly the effect you’d get from native 3K resolution (2.8K to be exact). Even if the white pixels are scattered around with no two white pixels ever being next to each other vertically or horizontally the maximum RGB-created color saturation and even resolution of these TVs is ¾ of what it is in a full RGB 4K TV set.
Yes, the UH6100, UH6400 and UF6800 “4K” TVs are being sold for lower prices than those of their full RGB LG 4K cousins (the 50 inch UH6100 and UH6400 models cost about $700 and $750 respectively and the smallest 55 inch UF6800 TV sells on Amazon for $1,500) but they’re still not being sold for reasonably cheap prices at all considering the defects that RGBW produces. Full 4K RGB budget TV models from Sony, Samsung and particularly Vizio can be found at the same or even lower prices while offering true 4K resolution, full RGB subpixels in all 8.29 million full pixels and black performance far better than that of these three LG TVs.
In very basic terms, LG is playing an unfair marketing and display quality game with the consumers who are thinking of buying these TVs or have bought them already.
-----
er det artikler som disse og denne omtale af fake 4K fra LG som du ligger til grund??